We should not call just anything "The Word of God" -- We must do careful due-diligence.
I douse bibles other than the King James (KJB) for comparison, but not
in routine practice.
I use the term King James Bible (KJB) rather than King
James Version (KJV) because the KJB is translated from different Greek Manuscripts, and thus is a different Bible, not just
a different version.
The KJB and other older bibles such as the Geneva Bible, that
the American Pilgrims used, are translated from the "Traditional Text," while modern bibles are translated from
the "Critical Text."
It would certainly seem to me that The Geneva Bible, 1599 (GB) published in 1560 and 1599, effectively provided a check, on the King James Bible finished in 1611. See the
history article at the site I just sited.
Today, however, the KJB is available in many many more
forms, electronic, etc., as compared to the GB and there are so many commentaries on the KJB that it is a very well known
So, although it is great to have the Geneva Bible for comparison, and for added
witness, the KJB is still much more accessible today.
After long study and prayer, discussed below,
I'm convinced the Traditional text has far superior claim to authenticity.
between these two kinds of bibles (modern ones versus KJB and GB) are due to the underlying text, not,
to translation. There are translation differences, also.
bibles have a bent or bias against the supernatural, against gender distinction, against God's special creation of all things,
against the Deity of Jesus Christ and against salvation by faith in him alone.
have, as it were, their brains pickled, in the juice of Darwinian evolutionary hypothesis, from their many years in the public
system and, thus, their translations reflect a distinct humanistic and naturalistic bent.
As I mention in my "God is a Straight Male" page, modern scholars reject the plain, cover to cover, in a thousand particulars, teaching, that God
is a straight male.
They reject this overwhelming teaching of the Bible, and hold to the,
God is neuter, myth. How can one dare trust a bible produced by these modern people who reject this plain, cover to
cover, teaching of Scripture? I do not.
The King James,
(KJB) is PUBLIC DOMAIN -- I don't need anyone's permission, nor do I have to acknowledge anyone
to quote all I want from the KJB. It is NOT OWNED by some corporation!!
The King James Bible (KJB) and other older bibles such as the Geneva Bible, that the American Pilgrims used, are
translated from the "Traditional Text," -- a tight knit collection of New Testament manuscripts descended from much
earlier Christian manuscripts.
The modern bibles are translated from the Critical Text,
a collection of older, much much more diverse manuscripts.
In response to my "petition" using
God's promise to believers in 1John 5:14-15, God showed me from John 17, Christ's High priestly prayer, that God's providential
transmission of His Word in the Scriptures, would come down through history directly connected with
his Church, the collection of all true believers, NOT long lost
in some obscure location.
That is, John 17 requires that God's authentic transmission
of his Word would come down through history hand in hand with his true people. This is true for the Traditional text,
but NOT for the Critical text.
The Vaticanus manuscript, one of the
two backbone constituents of the Critical text, was lost in the Vatican library for over a 1000 years, and the Sinaiticus
manuscript, the other main manuscript of the Critical text was found in a waste basket at the Monastery on Mt. Sinai on the
I believe the true Mt. Sinai is in present day Saudi Arabia, not at the
traditional location in the Sinai desert. See Ron Wyatt's site http://wyattmuseum.com/red-sea-crossing.htm and also Google "Red Sea Crossing" for many other excellent sites.
are produced by people whose brains a pickled in Darwinism, God-the-neuter-ism, gender-neutral-ism Naturalism, Political-correctness-ism,
and many other misconceptions.
Modern Bibles arecommercial
products and are forced to compete for market share. They may not be trying to make a "killing,"
but they don't want to miss a profit, either. If one of them doesn't fudge in the political correctness direction, others
The KJB and older bibles come out of the "Golden Age of Literature." Literary
expertise had reached it zenith at that time. The KJB translators were simply head-and-shoulders better than
Modern seminaries may graduate people with two years of
Greek -- people needed two years of Greek to get IN TO major collegesin the 1600s - the time of the
The traditional text IS RIGHTLY CALLED THE MAJORITY
TEXT. In my article God was Manifest in Flesh! I quote Wilbur Pickering (The Identity of the New Testament Text, 1977) who notes
that 80%+ of old handwritten New Testament manuscripts, in the case cited of 1 Timothy 3:16, 97%, match the King James
Thus, modern bibles are based on the very smallminority
of supposedly older manuscripts. As I said, Jesus in John17 indicates the Bible will come down to believers, providentially,
not by archaeological luck.
So, it is completely consistent with this concept that the
Traditional Text and the KJB enjoy the support of 80% or better, majority of ancient hand written Greek manuscripts.
Practically speaking, after hundreds of year on KJB dominance among English speakers, there are a zillion resources
still available for this version.
My Blackberry has the KJB in both audio, and text, and
JFB commentary (Robert Jamieson, A.R. Fausset, and David Brown, 1871), and Strong's Concordance, with Hebrew and Greek
I dare say no modern bible has the breadth and depth of "helps"
available for serious bible study.
I recommend, one Bible for Life:
The explosion in numbers of modern bibles, and usage, has made MUSH out of the brains of many bible readers.
Although I have used other bibles for comparison, I have used mainly the KJB. God-The-Holy-Ghost is
easily able to bring to my mind the EXACT KJB wording and phraseology, and this allows my mind to automatically
cross reference to other bible verses, and to understand God's will, and to search the bible too.
Having been in many bible study with many people I have found very great confusion in the
minds of people who have used multiple bibles.
The differing wording and phraseology in
each verse, between bibles, confuses the reader's minds, so they cannot remember where in the bible a certain word
or verse came from, and they often confuse it with different passages.
lost the "verbal" memory of what God said. A church will switch to a new "modern"
bible, then 10 years later, switch again to another bible, then 10 years later to yet another bible. The result
is chaos in the listener's or reader's minds.
In Matthew 4:4 Jesus was being tempted
by the Devil. He quoted the Old Testament VERBATIM: It is written, Man
shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Notice -- EVERY WORD. God's message was given in WORDS to mankind
through the prophets.
To repeat myself, many people I have done bible study with, used one bible
for while, then their church switched to another bible and so did they, and then 10 years later their church switched again,
and so did they.
Their brains cannot resolve the exact wording of a passage. Three
different versions floating around in their brains -- they can't remember -- did it say this, or that, in this place, or was
it some other place.
Their brains have been destroyed in terms of any "verbal"
memory of the bible -- they are left with vague concepts that they have trouble resolving, or putting their fingers on.
The so-called "readability" issue is badly misleading. Dealing with God involves concepts strange
to our natural understandings. It matters little whether one has to learn a new, so-called modern word, or a
new archaic word.
There is another aspect to the "readability problem."
The KJB contains a very very rich fabric of small very important, details. These make it more difficult
to read, at first, but, as one becomes more experienced in bible study, these details become more
and more important.
But, modern versions, pave or smooth these over, so that
the reader is unaware they are there. So, such readers are handicapped in later bible understanding because they have
been blind-sided to the existence of these rich, critical, details.
It is much better
to use the KJB from the start, and either, temporarily, note, but pass over these details, or use a commentary.
Furthermore, as our society has gone more and more "politically correct." Behaviors
and concepts correct with God, are no longer socially acceptable, and thus, there IS NO MODERN word
for these righteous concepts and behaviors. The ARCHAIC WORDS ARE THE ONLY ONES AVAILABLE.
Modern bibles are forced to effectively mistranslate in order to use a modern word, which is actually
INCORRECT. They do this to avoid using the only available correctword, because it
is an archaic, or it is a KJB word.
Take the case of the "thees" and "thous"
for example. These are archaic in our modern English usage, HOWEVER, they DO EXISTin the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts underlying our English bible.
So, modern versions
MUST falsify the bible in using a modern standard pronoun, because the correctcorresponding English pronouns are archaic.
To repeat myself, much or the supposed difficulty
of the old bibles is due to richness of important detail in the text. In order to be "readable" modern versions
will gloss over, or smooth over this rich detail.
This may seem to enhance readability,
but leaves the new reader blindsided to this rich detail, which is critical for more advanced, mature, understanding of God
and his Word.
It is much better to let the new reader note difficult areas, and bypass
them temporarily, letting the Holy Ghost bring their minds back to those areas of detail, for timely understanding, as
they become used to the "meat" of the Word (bible), moving on from the "milk" of the Word.
The KJB has been a major component in God's major, providential movement of the so-called Protestant Reformation.
The British Empire came to rule the seas, taking the KJB worldwide. Furthermore, the KJB followed in a line or previous
bibles as the Reformation advanced.
There are many many facets of the versions or bibles issue.
I have tried to set forth some main ones. Let me finish with reminding us that there is a major war going on, a no-fooling,
The Devil and his agents are sparing no
effort in confusing and tripping up God's purpose and people. Psalm 2 is exactly correct:
Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves,
and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder,
and cast away their cords from us.
He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD
shall have them in derision. Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. Yet have I
set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto
me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and
the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
Thou shalt break them with a rod of
iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of
Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be
angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little.
are all they that put their trust in him!
great scholar, C.I. Scofield sets forth a most powerful, cogent, argument for the divine authorship of the Bible.
Bible is at ONCE, SIXTY-SIX books, and yet truly, ONE BOOK.
From Genesis the Bible bears witness to one
Wherever He speaks or acts he is consistent with himself, and with the total revelation concerning Him.
The Bible forms one continuous story --the story of humanity in relation to God.
The Bible hazards the
most unlikely predictions concerning the future, and, when the centuries have brought round the appointed time, records their
The Bible is a progressive
unfolding of truth.
Nothing is told
all at once, and once for all. The law is, “First the blade, then the ear, after that the full grain.”
Without the possibility of collusion,
often with centuries between, one writer of Scripture takes up an earlier revelation, adds to it, lays down the pen,
and in due time another man moved by the Holy Spirit, and another, and another,
add new details till the whole is complete.
beginning to end the Bible testifies to one redemption.
The Bible has one great theme--the Person and work of Christ.
Finally, these writers, some forty in number, writing through twenty centuries,
have produced a perfect harmony of doctrine in progressive unfolding.
This is, to every candid mind, the unanswerable proof of the divine inspiration
of the Bible.”